Editorial Policy

Peer Review Process

All submissions to Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci undergo double anonymous peer review. Each submission will be reviewed by a minumum of two reviewers. If the reviewer opinions confront, the 3rd independent opinion is asked. Final decision is made by Editor-in-chief.

The Editorial team shall ensure reasonable quality control for the reviews. Concerning reviewers whose reviews are convincingly questioned by authors, special attention will be paid to ensure that the reviews are objective and high in academic standard. When there is any doubt about the objectivity of the reviews or the quality of the review, additional reviewers will be assigned.

Archiving Policy

All issues of Synesis are archived in DoiSrpska system managed by National and University Library of Republic of Srpska, and are available on link https://doisrpska.nub.rs/index.php/GSFUBL


Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci encourages self-archiving and allows authors to deposit the accepted, peer-reviewed version of the manuscript, as well as the final, published version (publisher's version), in PDF format in the institutional repository and / or non-commercial databases, to publish it on personal websites. including profiles on social networks for scientists, and / or on the website of the institution where they are employed, in accordance with the provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), at any time after publication in the journal. The basic bibliographic data on the article published in the journal (authors, title of the journal, year, volume, pagination), preferably the publisher, and the identifier of the digital object - DOI of the published article in the form of an HTML link must be stated.